The ability to argue

Imagine that someone disagrees with your opinion on an important topic. How do you respond? First, I try to understand why they think something different, and then I formulate counterarguments.
I am looking for a way to bridge our opinions and find common ground.
I firmly stand by my opinion and I try to defend it regardless of the other side.
Sometimes I say something provocative to throw the other party off balance and highlight the weaknesses of their argument.
I'll leave it as it is, there's no point in arguing, everyone thinks their own way anyway.

You are in a discussion and realize that you may be wrong. How do you react to that? I admit my mistake and I am trying to better understand the opposing viewpoint.
I will say that it's an interesting perspective, but I will try to defend my original argument further.
I'll switch to a different topic to avoid direct confrontation.
I will try to adjust my attitude to make it seem like I was right from the beginning.
I laugh out loud and admit that I was wrong – after all, nobody is perfect.

How do you react when someone uses inaccurate or manipulated facts in a discussion? I am trying to stay calm and gently point out inaccuracies.
I will correct him right away and show that his arguments are faulty.
I will use his tactic and twist the facts to my advantage.
I'll leave it that way, everyone believes in their own truth anyway.
I will try to ask him where he gets his information and guide him towards critical thinking.

You are in a situation where you have to defend your opinion in front of a group of people with an opposing viewpoint. How do you proceed? I will prepare clear arguments and strive to be convincing.
I prefer to listen and look for space for compromise.
I will identify weaknesses in their arguments and focus on refuting them.
I will share my opinion, but if I see strong resistance, I prefer not to engage in the discussion anymore.
I'll turn it into humor and try to lighten their attitude so that I don't upset them.

What factors are most important to you when formulating an argument? Logical structure and clarity of thoughts.
Emotional influence on the listeners.
The ability to use examples from life.
Speed and ability to improvise in debate.
The intention to win the discussion regardless of the truth.

When someone starts to get upset during a discussion, how do you react? I maintain my composure and try to bring the discussion back to factual arguments.
I will also start to be more emotional in order to maintain the dynamics of the debate.
I will try to lighten the situation with humor.
I will step back to avoid an unnecessary argument.
I will use his emotions against him and show that he has lost control.

If you had to convince someone of something important, what would you do first? First, I would try to understand his perspective on the matter.
I would immediately present him with strong arguments and facts.
I would use stories and emotions to engage him.
I would try to guide him to come to my opinion on his own.
I would set a small "trap" for him to make him realize the mistake in his thinking.

How would you prepare for an important public discussion or debate? I would thoroughly study all the facts and counterarguments.
I would practice my persuasive speech in front of a mirror or friends.
I would focus on a strategy to steer the discussion in my favor.
I would rather prepare a few funny answers in advance to win over the audience.
I would rely on improvisation – after all, a debate is about the speed of responses.

What communication style do you prefer the most when arguing? Calm and rational – facts decide.
Dynamic and persuasive – it depends on emotions.
Confrontational and straightforward – sometimes you need to be sharp.
Fun and relaxed – people respond better to humor.
Indirect and cautious – one should not provoke.

What do you think about manipulation in argumentation? It is incorrect, but sometimes we cannot avoid it.
If a person is smart enough, why not make use of it?
Manipulation is unfair and undermines the quality of the discussion.
It is important to know how to recognize it and use it against its user.
It depends on the situation – sometimes it can be tactically advantageous.