The ability to separate facts from assumptions

Fact Master: Distinguish Truth from Assumptions! Every day we encounter information that requires critical thinking. The ability to differentiate facts from assumptions helps us make better decisions.

This module focuses on developing logical and analytical thinking. Children will learn to identify reliable information and critically evaluate situations.

Ability to distinguish facts from assumptions – they will learn how to work with verified information.
Development of logical thinking – they will analyze situations more effectively.
Improvement of concentration – they will strengthen their ability to focus on important details.
More accurate decision-making – they will learn to make informed decisions based on facts.
Greater self-confidence – they will gain confidence in assessing situations and solving problems.

Are you ready to uncover the truth? Choose this module and train your analytical thinking!

What role does intuitive feeling play in your decision-making compared to facts? Intuition can be as powerful a tool as facts if I focus on it.
Facts are essential in decision-making, but my intuition often directs me in the right direction.
I tend to trust facts more and rely less on feelings.
I usually prefer what I know based on facts, but sometimes intuition helps when the situation is ambiguous.
Regardless of the facts, I often try to let my feelings and experiences dictate my decisions.

In a situation where someone is telling you something that seems interesting, but you don't have enough evidence, how do you react? If I don't have evidence, it is better to refrain from conclusions and I will wait for more information.
I am looking for quick ways to verify the truth of this information, even though it is just a hypothesis.
With such claims, I usually have doubts, but I don't judge right away; I just keep an open mind.
This type of information usually worries me, so I try to gather more details before making a decision.
I have a tendency to consider new information as true unless it directly contradicts my previous experiences.

How do you approach new information that contradicts your previous beliefs? I enjoy exploring new information and believe that even disagreement can be educational.
I tend to be skeptical and try to verify the truthfulness of information.
I take time to consider new facts and then decide whether my original idea is still valid.
It is not difficult for me to accept new information if it can be supported by facts.
I usually verify this information, but sometimes I can be quick to dismiss it if it seems too different from my perspective.

How do you make decisions when you have several contradictory statements but no direct evidence to support any of them? I focus on logical reasoning and seek the best possible solution even without clear evidence.
I usually prefer a waiting approach unless I can find support for one of the claims.
I am looking for independent sources of information or opinions from various experts to form my own picture.
Without direct evidence, I tend to make decisions based on previous experiences and analysis of the situation.
In such cases, I rely on my personal values and assumptions.

How do you react to situations when someone makes decisions based on assumptions that seem obvious but are not backed by facts? I am trying to highlight the lack of facts and offer arguments supported by data.
I can't help but express my disagreement with them, but sometimes I don't speak up directly if it's a small matter.
I prefer to show them how they can approach things differently, while not forgetting the sources of information.
I tend to listen, but if there is not a clear factual basis present, I do not accept it as truth.
Sometimes I ponder why someone acts based on assumptions, even though I know that it is not always the best approach.

How do you feel about information presented in an emotional tone, even when you don't have enough facts to verify it? I am trying to separate emotions from facts and look at what is objectively verifiable.
I tend to be cautious with such information because it can be biased.
Although I am aware that emotions can distort the truth, I sometimes allow myself to be swayed by a strong expression.
I focus more on the tone and the way the information is presented than on the content itself.
When something is presented with strong emotions, I always ask myself whether it is really a fact or just an opinion.

If you find that you have made a decision based on unverified information, what is your next step? I am definitely trying to find evidence to either confirm or change my decision.
I feel the need to adjust my decision as soon as I obtain the correct information.
If it turns out that I was wrong, I take it as a lesson and try to make it right.
I try to learn from my own mistakes and make decisions more cautiously based on new information.
I will admit it if I was wrong, but sometimes I simply hold onto my opinion even when it is not backed by facts.

How do you recognize that something is more of an assumption than a fact? I analyze the source of information and search for clear evidence that supports the claim.
I am guided by whether the information is supported by verifiable data, or if it is just opinions.
I carefully pay attention to the context of the information and determine whether it aligns with other facts.
I am trying to separate facts from opinions by asking whether the statement is verifiable.
I often ask myself whether it is something that can be clearly confirmed, or if it is just someone’s interpretation.

If you have two options to choose from, with one based on quick intuition and the other backed by facts, what do you do? I will focus on the one that has the strongest foundation in real evidence, even if it may be slower.
I believe in balance, so if the facts are strong, intuitive decision-making can be helpful when it suits the situation.
Even though the facts are clear, my intuition often decides more quickly, and that is why I prefer it.
I am trying to evaluate both options and make a decision based on a combination of facts and intuition.
I prefer making decisions based on facts, but sometimes I also make quick decisions based on intuition.

How do you react when someone claims that something is true, but has no concrete evidence to support it? I usually think about how these claims might look in context and whether they can be believed without evidence.
Sometimes I try to gather more information, but if no evidence arises, I am not ready to accept it as truth.
If someone asserts something to me but has no evidence, I can evaluate it as an unverified piece of information and I will not immediately agree with it.
I will try to clarify why it is important to have evidence and why it is dangerous to make decisions without it.
Even without evidence, I sometimes allow myself to be influenced by what someone tells me, as long as it doesn't seem completely illogical.