- This argument seems to me like a nostalgic defense of something that may no longer hold true.
- When something is based on the past, it can be outdated, but it can also be very relevant.
- Such an approach leads me to questions about how things have evolved, and whether the past is truly a reliable measure.
- This type of argument reminds me of dogmatism, which does not want to see other perspectives.
- It is a somewhat closed-minded view of the situation that misjudges the current circumstances.
