- Such a statement seems to me to be just a convenient generalization that avoids deeper analysis.
- Perhaps this is true in some cases, but I believe that not everything that is new has to be illogical.
- This type of argument is often used by people who are afraid of change, and it limits my thinking.
- This approach does not seem flexible to me because it ignores the fact that logic can change with new evidence.
- I feel that this way of arguing is not sufficiently open to new possibilities.
